6 Results
filtered by...
Filter
Tags > driving
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
Category
- COVID-19
- City Infrastructure
- City Management and Ethics
- Culture and Recreation
- Economy and Community
- Energy and Environment
- Geographic Locations and Boundaries
- Health and Social Services
- Housing and Buildings
- Public Safety
- Transportation
Publishing Department
- 311
- Airport (SFO)
- Arts Commission
- Assessor-Recorder
- Board of Supervisors
- Building Inspection
- Citizen Complaints
- City College
- Community Investment and Infrastructure
- Controller
- Economic & Workforce Development
- Elections
- Environment
- Ethics Commission
- Film Commission
- Fire Department
- GSA - City Administrator's Office
- Health Service System
- Human Resources
- Human Rights Commission
- Human Services Agency
- Mayor
- Municipal Transportation Agency
- Other
- Planning
- Police Department
- Port
- Public Health
- Public Utilities Commission
- Public Works
- Recreation and Parks
- Rent Arbitration Board
- Technology
- Treasurer-Tax Collector
- Academy of Sciences
- Adult Probation
- Asian Art Museum
- Board of Appeals
- Child Support Services
- Children and Families Commission
- Children, Youth & Their Families
- City Attorney
- Civil Service Commission
- District Attorney
- Early Care and Education
- Emergency Management
- Fine Arts Museums
- Juvenile Probation
- Law Library
- Public Defender
- Public Library
- Retirement System
- School District (SFUSD)
- Sheriff
- Status of Women
- Superior Court
- War Memorial
Tags
- driving
- 'bicycle counts
- 100-year storm flood risk zone
- 3d
- 460
- 461
- 465
- 496
- 497
- 911
- @sfclimatehealth
- @sfclimatehealth.org
- ab953
- absent heirs
- abuse prevention
- acceptance
- accepted
- access
- accessible parking
- activity
- actors
- acute
- ada
- aerial photos
- all
- analysis neighborhood
- annual rent increase
- apec
- aquatics
- artists
- arts
- arts commission
- arts funding
- arts organizations
- aviation
- award
- ballot measure
- banner
- bayview
- behested payment waiver
- bicycle
- bicycle corrals
- bicycle counter
- bicycle loop counter
- bicycle parking
- bicycle racks
- bicycles
- bike cages
- bike corrals
- bike counter
- bike loop
- bike parking
- bike racks
- bike share
- bike volume'
- bikes
- block
- block midpoint
- blockface
- blocks
- blue zones
- board
- bond issuances
- booking
- build
- bulk
- bureau
- bus
- bus stop
- buyouts
- c-3
- cable car
- cable car stops
- cad
- cadastral
- call center
- caltrans
- campaign finance dashboards 2016
- capital assets
- capital program
- car share
- carshare
- cash
- catalog
- catch basin
- catchment basin
- cellphone
- census tract
- certified
- chairs
- child development centers
- children
- chinatown
- circulation
- citylots
- civic art
- cleaning
- clearance heights
- clients
- climate
- closures
- cnns
- code
- coi
- color curb
- colored curb
- comet
- commercial vacancy tax
- commission
- committee
- commodity
- community college
- community resiliency system
- communitywide
- compensation
- condo
- condominium
- condos
- congestion
- conservation
- contracts
- conversion
- corrals
- cross street
- crossing guard
- crossing guards
- cultural center
- cultural centers
- cultural recreation
- culture
- current planning
- current zoning
- dashboards
- data
- daylighting
- design
- designated employee
- directors
- disability
- display
- districts
- downtown
- downtown plan
- drawings
- drinking fountain
- emergency calls
- employee
- encampment
- enforcement
- engine runs
- equity
- equity strategy
- equity strategy neighborhoods
- estimated cost
- estoppel notices
- ethnicity
- event
- eviction
- excelsior-outer mission
- exhibit
- exhibition
- expenditure lobbyist registration
- expenditure lobbyist registration lobbying disclosure reports
- expenditures
- expenses
- fees
- file geodatabase
- filing
- film
- fines
- fire station
- five
- flight
- flights
- flood
- flu
- footprints
- fsr
- fuel
- gallery
- garages
- geography
- ghg inventory
- gov code 6270.5
- government performance
- government permit
- grant funding
- green
- green building
- green connections
- growth
- gtfs
- handwashing
- hate
- hate crime
- hayward earthquake scenario
- health assessment
- health impacts
- height
- historical
- history
- homeless
- homeless count
- homelessness
- hospital
- hospital beds
- hospital capacity
- icu
- in
- inclusion
- inclusionary housing
- individual expenditure ceilings
- influenza
- information
- inner mission
- interesection
- intersections
- jail
- jobs
- justice
- key
- lagan
- land
- land use
- landings
- landslide hazard zone
- landuse
- lanes
- language
- language access
- lao
- large
- late
- late fees
- leed
- limited no parking
- liquefaction hazard zones
- liquefaction susceptibility
- livable streets
- lives
- lobbying
- lobbying disclosure reports
- lobbyist training
- locations
- loop counter
- lottery
- low income neighborhoods
- lrv
- lrv stops
- ludb
- maintenance
- manifold
- maps
- mechanical
- medical
- member
- meter
- metrics
- metro
- miles
- moratorium
- moto
- motorcycle parking
- motorcycles
- movies
- mph
- mpx
- multimodal
- muni forward
- muni service equity strategy
- municipal
- municipal transportation agency
- museum
- names
- narrow
- natural gas
- navigation
- no overnight parking
- no parking any time
- noi
- non-prj
- non-responsive
- notification
- nr
- occupancy
- ocii
- off street
- officials
- on street car share
- on street car share pilot
- on street parking
- on-street
- onstreet
- open
- open space
- order
- overpass
- oversized vehicles
- painted safety zone
- painted safety zones
- park maintenance
- park scores
- parking census
- parking district
- parking management district
- parking regulations
- parking space inventory
- parking supply
- parklet
- passengers
- patron
- payment
- photos
- pim
- pit stop
- pitstop
- plant
- plantfinder
- plants
- pmd
- police station
- political
- popos
- posting
- prime contractor
- priority
- private schools
- probability
- procurement contract
- project
- project team
- projects
- prop c
- property tax
- property value
- propositions
- psi
- psz
- public art
- public complaints
- public lines
- public schools
- race
- race/ethnicity
- racks
- rail
- rail stops
- ramps
- rec and park
- recovery
- recreation
- recreation class
- recreation program
- red carpet
- red lanes
- regression model
- rehab
- removal
- rent increase
- reservoir inundation hazard zones
- residential parking permit
- residential permits
- resilience
- restroom
- retail
- retaining
- retirement
- revenue
- ridership
- right of way
- ripa
- roadway
- roofs
- roundabout
- routes
- row
- rsis
- rush hour
- rush hour routes
- safe sleeping
- salaries
- salary
- san andreas scenario
- san francisco arts commission
- san francisco climate action strategy
- san francisco climate and health program
- san francisco indicator project
- san francisco's climate & health program
- sanitary scores
- sb 272
- sb272
- school
- schools
- segment
- service
- sf plant finder
- sfac
- sfarts
- shelter
- sheriff
- shuttles
- side of street
- sidewalk clearance
- sidewalk widths
- sign
- signage
- sink
- slr
- smf
- sourcing
- special events
- speed
- speed limits
- ssd
- stairs
- stairway
- statistics
- stop attributes
- stop features
- stop location
- stop signs
- storm drain
- stormwater
- street closures
- street-use
- structure
- sub-vendors
- subcontractor
- sud
- supervisor
- supplier
- surface mounted
- surface mounted facility
- surge
- sweeping
- system
- systems
- tableau
- tables
- tails
- taxi
- telecommunication
- temp bulb
- temporary
- temporary bulbout
- temporary tow zones
- tent
- tent count
- test
- testing by neighborhood
- therapeutic recreation
- time limits
- title vi
- tl
- toilet
- traffic
- traffic calming
- traffic circle
- traffic control
- traffic island
- transit access
- transit lines
- transit network
- transit only lanes
- truck routes
- tsunami
- type
- underpass
- unit
- unmetered motorcycle parking
- unmetered parking
- unpaid
- utility usage
- valuation
- vehicle restrictions
- vendors
- vistacion valley
- vmt
- volume
- voucher
- wall
- water
- water spigot
- western addition
- width
- works
- wzdx
- zip
- zones
- 2011
- 2013
- 803
- addresses
- allcnnsinorder
- analytics
- annual dataset
- appointments
- artist
- artworks
- assessor
- bathroom
- benchmark
- benefits
- bicycle progression
- bicycle signal
- bicycle signal timing
- bicycle timing
- bid
- bike
- blockfaces
- boundary
- campaign consultants
- campaign finance dashboard 2015
- campaign finance dashboard 2016
- canopy
- cares act
- cars
- ceilings
- cell
- census block
- census block group
- centerlines
- charitable
- city departments
- citywide performance measurement
- client
- code violations
- collisions
- community resiliency
- compensated advocacy ban
- complaints
- condition
- congress
- consultant
- contract
- contribution
- controller
- covid19 testing
- crime
- crime reports
- curb
- dataset monitoring
- dbi
- disbursed
- eas
- employees
- ethics enforcement complaints sunshine
- eviction notices
- exceptions
- feature
- federal
- financing
- funds
- gifts
- grants
- green waves
- grime
- hdmt
- healthy development measurement tool
- incidents
- index
- individual
- inspections
- inventory
- issues
- jurisdiction
- lab testing
- leaks
- library
- loans
- local officeholders
- lots
- mast
- mayor
- mff
- monkeypox
- motor vehicles
- mounted
- node
- november 4
- november 5
- open data
- pandemic unemployment insurance
- parcel
- parks
- pavement
- pci
- post-employment restriction waivers
- preparedness
- presidio
- presidio trust
- procurement
- property
- pua
- public bathroom
- public facilities
- public financing
- public health
- public office
- public works
- purchase order
- purchasing
- re-registration
- ref:inventory
- registered
- registration
- resiliency
- restaurant scores
- results
- right
- rpp
- sci
- score
- scorecards
- screening checkpoint
- sea level rise
- services
- sfclimatehealth.org
- sfgov
- sidewalks
- signs
- slopes
- speed limit
- spills
- stops
- street intersections
- street sweeping
- surface
- sustainability
- sustainable communities index
- tenderloin
- tenderloin-soma
- testing
- topography
- tow
- tower
- traffic crashes
- transportation projects
- truck
- trucks
- ui
- unemployment
- unemployment insurance
- use
- utility
- utility consumption
- verification
- violations
- vision zero
- waivers
- water fountain
- way
- web
- wireless
- 5
- airlines
- antenna
- art
- avl
- bart
- behested
- benchmarking
- budget
- ceqa
- city employees
- contributions
- employment
- fire inspections
- fire safety
- food
- fppc
- gps
- iec
- inspection
- mapping
- mode share
- noise
- november 4 2014
- of
- park
- phone
- police
- protected status
- real estate
- restrictions
- safety
- satisfaction survey
- schedule
- sfo ground transportation
- sfplanning
- street evaluation
- supervisor district
- tnc
- tree
- vaccines
- year
- zoning districts
- aircraft
- amount
- base
- biking
- boundaries
- business
- candidate
- carbon emissions
- controller's street evaluation program
- department of public health
- district
- evaluation
- fire
- fte
- graffiti
- intersection
- litter
- meters
- mobile
- mohcd
- november 6
- november 6 2012
- phes
- police department
- promised
- received
- sfpark
- sfpd
- sfphes
- shapefile
- space
- staffing
- taxis
- third-party
- trash
- travel
- vendor
- voting
- zip code
- 2014
- bicycling
- building safety
- disclosure
- dph
- energy
- environment
- excavation
- muni
- neighborhoods
- nonprofit
- parcels
- performance
- plan
- ref:basemap
- rent control
- sfdph
- trees
- utilities
- affordable housing
- buildings
- climate change
- cnn
- environmental health
- geologic
- greenhouse gas emissions
- historic
- november
- preservation
- public
- san francisco
- spending
- 2012
- basemap
- map
- non-filer
- paving
- precincts
- vaccination
- walking
- zoning
- ceiling
- city reference data
- open book
- openbook
- payments
- schedules
- sfopenbook
- sidewalk
- voluntary
- planning pipeline housing construction permits development residential commercial building
- campaign consultant
- covid
- covid-19
- hcr
- sfmta
- census
- construction permits
- elections
- expenditure
- lobbyist
- transit
- transportation
- customer
- case
- customer service
- gis
- streets
- 311
- parking
- calls
- cases
- conflict of interest
- statement of economic interests
- street
- vec
- candidates
- sei
- voluntary expenditure ceiling
- airport
- form 700
- survey
- sfo
- campaign finance
- permit
- building
- finance
- campaign
- pipeline
- residential
- commercial
- housing
- construction
- election
- development
- permits
- public buildings
- planning
- facility
- ethics
6 Results
filtered by
Tags > driving
Clear All
**Please refer to the downloadable XLSX attachment (http://bit.ly/SFMTATravelSurvey2019) for the complete dataset, metadata, and instructions for use.**
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2019 Travel Decision Survey.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.2: Mode Share target of 80% sustainable travel by 2030.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.2: Mode Share target of 80% sustainable travel by 2030.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among 801 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, and Tagalog. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2019: May - August 2019
2019: May - August 2019
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.3% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 801(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.3%
• n = 400. Margin of error = +/- 4.85%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
• n = 801(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.3%
• n = 400. Margin of error = +/- 4.85%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
March 13 2024
Views
2,140
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2014 Travel Decision Survey.
The 2014 Key Findings, Summary Report, and Methodology, including the survey instrument, can be found online at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2014.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The 2014 Key Findings, Summary Report, and Methodology, including the survey instrument, can be found online at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2014.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among with approximately 750 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, and Cantonese. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2014: October – November 2014
2014: October – November 2014
A few questions in TDS 2014 were added after the survey began. In the report, responses that did not answer those questions were excluded from the analysis. The questions that were added late are noted in the TDS 2014 methodology survey instrument.
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
March 13 2024
Views
1,530
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2017 Travel Decision Survey.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among 804 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, and Tagalog. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2017: February - April 2017
2017: February - April 2017
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.4% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 804(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.4%
• n = 400. Margin of error = +/- 4.85%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
• n = 804(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.4%
• n = 400. Margin of error = +/- 4.85%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
March 13 2024
Views
2,868
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2012 Travel Decision Survey.
The 2012 Summary Report, with methodology and survey instrument, is located at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2012.
Data, methodologies, and summary report for other SFMTA travel decision surveys are available on sfmta.com.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The 2012 Summary Report, with methodology and survey instrument, is located at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2012.
Data, methodologies, and summary report for other SFMTA travel decision surveys are available on sfmta.com.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among with approximately 750 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, and Cantonese. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
This dataset incorporates respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
This dataset incorporates respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2012: October 2012 – January 2013
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
2012: October 2012 – January 2013
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
March 13 2024
Views
734
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2013 Travel Decision Survey.
The 2013 Summary Report and Methodology, including the survey instrument, can be found online at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2013.
Data, methodologies, and summary report for other SFMTA travel decision surveys is available on sfmta.com.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The 2013 Summary Report and Methodology, including the survey instrument, can be found online at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2013.
Data, methodologies, and summary report for other SFMTA travel decision surveys is available on sfmta.com.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among with approximately 750 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, and Cantonese. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2013: April 2014 – May 2014 (survey name of 2013 reflects the originally planned start date of Fall 2013)
2013: April 2014 – May 2014 (survey name of 2013 reflects the originally planned start date of Fall 2013)
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
March 13 2024
Views
1,000
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2015 Travel Decision SurveySFMTA Travel Decision Survey Data for 2015
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among 762 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, and Cantonese. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2015: August – October 2015
2015: August – October 2015
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 762(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 382. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 762(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 382. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%