Effective January 1, 2015, an individual who qualifies as a permit consultant under San Francisco law must register and file quarterly reports with the Ethics Commission. A permit consultant is an individual who receives or is promised compensation to provide permit consulting services on a "major project" or a "minor project", including any employee who receives compensation for time spent on permit consulting services.

"Permit consulting services" means any contact with the Department of Building Inspection, the Entertainment Commission, the Planning Department, or the Department of Public Works to help a permit applicant obtain a permit. "Permit consulting services" do not include simple requests for information which do not otherwise include attempts to help obtain a permit.

A "major project" is a real estate development project located in the City and County of San Francisco with estimated construction costs exceeding $1,000,000 and which requires a permit issued by the Department of Building Inspection or the Planning Department. Estimated constructions costs are to be calculated in the same manner used to determine building permit fees under the Building Code. A "minor project" is a project located in the City and County of San Francisco which requires a permit issued by the Entertainment Commission.

The following individuals are not permit consultants and thus are not required to register or report:
-a licensed architect or engineer of record for construction activity allowed or contemplated by the permit, or an employee of that architect or engineer;
-a contractor who will be responsible for all construction activity associated with the requested permit, or an employee of that contractor; or
-an employee or agent of an organization with tax exempt status under 26 United States Code Section 501(c)(3) communicating on behalf of that organization regarding the development of a project for that organization.

Each permit consultant must register with the Ethics Commission no later than five business days after providing permit consulting services. Quarterly disclosure reports must subsequently be filed with the Ethics Commission

Effective January 1, 2015, an individual who qualifies as a permit consultant under San Francisco law must register and file quarterly reports with the Ethics Commission. A permit consultant is an individual who receives or is promised compensation to provide permit consulting services on a "major project" or a "minor project", including any employee who receives compensation for time spent on permit consulting services.

"Permit consulting services" means any contact with the Department of Building Inspection, the Entertainment Commission, the Planning Department, or the Department of Public Works to help a permit applicant obtain a permit. "Permit consulting services" do not include simple requests for information which do not otherwise include attempts to help obtain a permit.

A "major project" is a real estate development project located in the City and County of San Francisco with estimated construction costs exceeding $1,000,000 and which requires a permit issued by the Department of Building Inspection or the Planning Department. Estimated constructions costs are to be calculated in the same manner used to determine building permit fees under the Building Code. A "minor project" is a project located in the City and County of San Francisco which requires a permit issued by the Entertainment Commission.

The following individuals are not permit consultants and thus are not required to register or report:
-a licensed architect or engineer of record for construction activity allowed or contemplated by the permit, or an employee of that architect or engineer;
-a contractor who will be responsible for all construction activity associated with the requested permit, or an employee of that contractor; or
-an employee or agent of an organization with tax exempt status under 26 United States Code Section 501(c)(3) communicating on behalf of that organization regarding the development of a project for that organization.

Each permit consultant must register with the Ethics Commission no later than five business days after providing permit consulting services. Quarterly disclosure reports must subsequently be filed with the Ethics Commission

This data set pertains to all types of structural permits. Data includes details on application/permit numbers, job addresses, supervisorial districts, and the current status of the applications. Data is uploaded weekly by DBI. Users can access permit information online through DBI’s Permit Tracking System which is 24/7 at www.sfdbi.org/dbipts.

Note if you need to open permits in Excel, use one of the pre-filtered datasets:

1. Building Permits on or after January 1, 2013 https://data.sfgov.org/d/p4e4-a5a7
2. Building Permits before January 1, 2013 https://data.sfgov.org/d/4jpb-z4kk

This dataset pertains to all types of electrical permits. Data includes details on application/permit numbers, job addresses, supervisorial districts, and the current status of the applications. Data is uploaded weekly by DBI. Users can access permit information online through DBI’s Permit Tracking System which is 24/7 at www.sfdbi.org/dbipts.

This data set pertains to all permits to operate boilers. Data includes details on application/permit numbers, job addresses, supervisorial districts, and the current status of the applications. Data is uploaded weekly by DBI. Users can access permit information online through DBI’s Permit Tracking System which is 24/7 at www.sfdbi.org/dbipts.

This data set pertains to all types of plumbing and mechanical permits. Data includes details on application/permit numbers, job addresses, supervisorial districts, and the current status of the applications. Data is uploaded weekly by DBI. Users can access permit information online through DBI’s Permit Tracking System which is 24/7 at www.sfdbi.org/dbipts.

On January 1, 2019, a new local law went into effect that established new requirements for behested payment reports. San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code section 3.610 requires City elective officers and members of certain boards and commissions to file behested payment reports (SFEC Form 3610b) with the Ethics Commission.

An official must file SFEC Form 3610b any time a behested payment of $1,000 or more is made at his or her behest by an interested party. An interested party is a person who is a party or participant to certain types of proceedings before the official in question. Those proceedings are limited to administrative enforcement proceedings and proceedings regarding permits, licenses, or other entitlements for use. A party to such a proceeding is someone who files an application for a license, permit, or entitlement for use or is the subject of the administrative enforcement. A participant in such a proceeding is someone who is not a party to the proceeding but who actively supports or opposes a particular decision in the proceeding and has a financial interest in the decision.

The filing deadline for SFEC Form 3610b depends on the circumstances under which the behested payment was made.

If the behested payment was made while the proceeding involving the interested party is pending before the official, then the form must be filed within thirty days of the payment being made. If there is a series of behested payments, the form is due within 30 days of the payment that makes the total $1,000 or more.

If the behested payment was made within six months following the date on which a final decision was made in the proceeding involving the interested party, then the form must be filed within thirty days of the payment. If there is a series of behested payments, the form is due within 30 days of the payment that makes the total $1,000 or more.

Finally, if the behested payment was made in the 12 months prior to the commencement of the proceeding involving the interested party, the form is due within 30 days of the date the official knew or should have known that the source of the behested payment became an interested party.

Each row on this table represents the contents of a Form 3610b filed with the Ethics Commission. There is one sub-tables of information on Form 3610b: Payors. The sub-table is available in a separate dataset: "SFEC Form 3610b - City Officers Behested Payment - Payors" at https://data.sfgov.org/City-Management-and-Ethics/SFEC-Form-3610b-City-Officers-Behested-Payment-Pay/m9gk-e9r5. Join this dataset with the sub-table using the DocuSignID.

A summary of SFO International ground transportation trips by permit type and month. Includes the revenue and number of trips for each month and type.

On January 1, 2019, a new local law went into effect that established new requirements for behested payment reports. San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code section 3.610 requires City elective officers and members of certain boards and commissions to file behested payment reports (SFEC Form 3610b) with the Ethics Commission.

An official must file SFEC Form 3610b any time a behested payment of $1,000 or more is made at his or her behest by an interested party. An interested party is a person who is a party or participant to certain types of proceedings before the official in question. Those proceedings are limited to administrative enforcement proceedings and proceedings regarding permits, licenses, or other entitlements for use. A party to such a proceeding is someone who files an application for a license, permit, or entitlement for use or is the subject of the administrative enforcement. A participant in such a proceeding is someone who is not a party to the proceeding but who actively supports or opposes a particular decision in the proceeding and has a financial interest in the decision.

The filing deadline for SFEC Form 3610b depends on the circumstances under which the behested payment was made.

If the behested payment was made while the proceeding involving the interested party is pending before the official, then the form must be filed within thirty days of the payment being made. If there is a series of behested payments, the form is due within 30 days of the payment that makes the total $1,000 or more.

If the behested payment was made within six months following the date on which a final decision was made in the proceeding involving the interested party, then the form must be filed within thirty days of the payment. If there is a series of behested payments, the form is due within 30 days of the payment that makes the total $1,000 or more.

Finally, if the behested payment was made in the 12 months prior to the commencement of the proceeding involving the interested party, the form is due within 30 days of the date the official knew or should have known that the source of the behested payment became an interested party.

Each row in this dataset represents information about payors reported in the "Payors Information" sub-table of a Form 3610b filed with the Ethics Commission. The parent filing and form data is available in a separate dataset: "SFEC Form 3610b - City Officer Behested Payment - Filings" at https://data.sfgov.org/City-Management-and-Ethics/SFEC-Form-3610b-City-Officer-Behested-Payment-Fili/7vmk-cq9e. Join this dataset with the sub-table using the DocuSignID.

Construction work at a building site is controlled and scheduled through the permit process by the submission and approval of a series of segmented phased construction plans identified as addenda. Addenda are routed and approved at a set of stations that vary based on the content of the plans being submitted for approval. The number of addenda submitted per permit will vary based on the type and complexity of the project. This dataset contains a row for each step for one or many addenda associated with a permit application. These records can be tied to the building permit dataset at https://data.sfgov.org/d/i98e-djp9 by application number.