8 Results
filtered by...
Filter
Tags > transportation
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
Categories
- City Infrastructure
- City Management and Ethics
- Culture and Recreation
- Economy and Community
- Energy and Environment
- Geographic Locations and Boundaries
- Health and Social Services
- Housing and Buildings
- Public Safety
- Transportation
View Types
Publishing Department
- 311
- Airport (SFO)
- Arts Commission
- Assessor-Recorder
- Board of Supervisors
- Building Inspection
- Citizen Complaints
- City College
- Community Investment and Infrastructure
- Controller
- Economic & Workforce Development
- Elections
- Environment
- Ethics Commission
- Film Commission
- Fire Department
- GSA - City Administrator's Office
- Health Service System
- Human Resources
- Human Rights Commission
- Human Services Agency
- Mayor
- Municipal Transportation Agency
- Other
- Planning
- Police Department
- Port
- Public Health
- Public Utilities Commission
- Public Works
- Recreation and Parks
- Rent Arbitration Board
- Technology
- Treasurer-Tax Collector
- Academy of Sciences
- Adult Probation
- Asian Art Museum
- Board of Appeals
- Child Support Services
- Children and Families Commission
- Children, Youth & Their Families
- City Attorney
- Civil Service Commission
- District Attorney
- Early Care and Education
- Emergency Management
- Fine Arts Museums
- Juvenile Probation
- Law Library
- Public Defender
- Public Library
- Retirement System
- School District (SFUSD)
- Sheriff
- Status of Women
- Superior Court
- War Memorial
Tags
- ethics
- campaign
- finance
- fppc
- form
- 460
- election
- summary
- candidates
- planning
- contributions
- disclosure
- third-party
- facility
- monetary
- november
- campaign finance
- public
- public buildings
- expenditure
- candidate
- shapefile
- 2012
- public financing
- gis
- iec
- development
- disbursed
- funds
- construction
- zoning
- 2014
- housing
- permits
- commercial
- voluntary expenditure ceiling
- cases
- pipeline
- 311
- individual
- payments
- case
- customer service
- calls
- ceilings
- financing
- form 700
- late
- sei
- conflict of interest
- residential
- statement of economic interests
- independent
- lobbyist
- sfo
- airport
- vec
- campaign consultant
- expenditures
- survey
- contribution
- dashboards
- individual expenditure ceilings
- street
- 496
- city reference data
- committee
- customer
- ref:basemap
- building
- non-monetary
- open book
- openbook
- promised
- sfopenbook
- 497
- parking
- received
- campaign finance dashboard 2015
- ceiling
- paving
- san francisco
- schedules
- voluntary
- ballot measure
- loans
- map
- non-filer
- spending
- trees
- 2011
- basemap
- construction permits
- dph
- elections
- environmental health
- excavation
- mayor
- sfmta
- transportation
Filter
8 Results
filtered by
Tags > transportation
Clear All
Updated
August 28 2016
Views
405
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2015 Travel Decision SurveySFMTA Travel Decision Survey Data for 2015
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among 762 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, and Cantonese. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2015: August – October 2015
2015: August – October 2015
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 762(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 382. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 762(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 382. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
May 3 2016
Views
1,189
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2014 Travel Decision Survey.
The 2014 Key Findings, Summary Report, and Methodology, including the survey instrument, can be found online at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2014.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The 2014 Key Findings, Summary Report, and Methodology, including the survey instrument, can be found online at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2014.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among with approximately 750 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, and Cantonese. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2014: October – November 2014
2014: October – November 2014
A few questions in TDS 2014 were added after the survey began. In the report, responses that did not answer those questions were excluded from the analysis. The questions that were added late are noted in the TDS 2014 methodology survey instrument.
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
March 15 2016
Views
925
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2017 Travel Decision Survey.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among 804 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, and Tagalog. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2017: February - April 2017
2017: February - April 2017
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.4% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 804(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.4%
• n = 400. Margin of error = +/- 4.85%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
• n = 804(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.4%
• n = 400. Margin of error = +/- 4.85%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
October 20 2017
Views
806
External Link
Freight routes, major arterials and key secondary arterials used to deliver manufactured goods by truck to San Francisco.
Updated
December 22 2016
Views
2,387
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2013 Travel Decision Survey.
The 2013 Summary Report and Methodology, including the survey instrument, can be found online at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2013.
Data, methodologies, and summary report for other SFMTA travel decision surveys is available on sfmta.com.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The 2013 Summary Report and Methodology, including the survey instrument, can be found online at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2013.
Data, methodologies, and summary report for other SFMTA travel decision surveys is available on sfmta.com.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among with approximately 750 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, and Cantonese. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
All three survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2013: April 2014 – May 2014 (survey name of 2013 reflects the originally planned start date of Fall 2013)
2013: April 2014 – May 2014 (survey name of 2013 reflects the originally planned start date of Fall 2013)
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
March 15 2016
Views
407
File or Document
This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2012 Travel Decision Survey.
The 2012 Summary Report, with methodology and survey instrument, is located at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2012.
Data, methodologies, and summary report for other SFMTA travel decision surveys are available on sfmta.com.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The 2012 Summary Report, with methodology and survey instrument, is located at https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/travel-decision-survey-2012.
Data, methodologies, and summary report for other SFMTA travel decision surveys are available on sfmta.com.
On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano.
The primary goals of this study were to:
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
• Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.3: Mode Share target of 50% non-private auto travel by FY2018 with a 95% confidence level and MOE +/- 5% or less.
• Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included.
• Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series.
• Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco.
• Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs.
The survey was conducted as a telephone study among with approximately 750 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, and Cantonese. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample.
This dataset incorporates respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
This dataset incorporates respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis.
The survey period for this survey is as follows:
2012: October 2012 – January 2013
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
2012: October 2012 – January 2013
The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.5% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes.
At the 95% confidence level is:
• n = 767 (Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.5%
• n = 384. Margin of error = +/- 4.95%
• n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%
Updated
March 15 2016
Views
276
Statistics on speeding rates and exceedance of speed limit along selected street segments throughout San Francisco. The dataset was prepared as part of the SF Indicators project and covers from 2004 through 2009. http://www.sfindicatorproject.org/indicators/view/49
Updated
September 30 2016
Views
905
Showing 1-8 of 8 results
Publishing Department
A-Z
- 311
- Academy of Sciences
- Adult Probation
- Airport (SFO)
- Arts Commission
- Asian Art Museum
- Assessor-Recorder
- Board of Appeals
- Board of Supervisors
- Building Inspection
- Child Support Services
- Children and Families Commission
- Children, Youth & Their Families
- Citizen Complaints
- City Attorney
- City College
- Civil Service Commission
- Community Investment and Infrastructure
- Controller
- District Attorney
- Early Care and Education
- Economic & Workforce Development
- Elections
- Emergency Management
- Environment
- Ethics Commission
- Film Commission
- Fine Arts Museums
- Fire Department
- GSA - City Administrator's Office
- Health Service System
- Human Resources
- Human Rights Commission
- Human Services Agency
- Juvenile Probation
- Law Library
- Mayor
- Municipal Transportation Agency
- Other
- Planning
- Police Department
- Port
- Public Defender
- Public Health
- Public Library
- Public Utilities Commission
- Public Works
- Recreation and Parks
- Rent Arbitration Board
- Retirement System
- School District (SFUSD)
- Sheriff
- Status of Women
- Superior Court
- Technology
- Treasurer-Tax Collector
- War Memorial
Tags
A-Z
- 2011 (6)
- 2012 (39)
- 2014 (28)
- 311 (23)
- 460 (190)
- 496 (12)
- 497 (9)
- airport (18)
- ballot measure (7)
- basemap (6)
- building (10)
- calls (21)
- campaign (340)
- campaign consultant (17)
- campaign finance (59)
- campaign finance dashboard 2015 (8)
- candidate (44)
- candidates (113)
- case (22)
- cases (24)
- ceiling (8)
- ceilings (21)
- city reference data (12)
- commercial (25)
- committee (11)
- conflict of interest (20)
- construction (30)
- construction permits (6)
- contribution (15)
- contributions (70)
- customer (11)
- customer service (22)
- dashboards (15)
- development (35)
- disbursed (34)
- disclosure (65)
- dph (6)
- election (157)
- elections (6)
- environmental health (6)
- ethics (412)
- excavation (6)
- expenditure (45)
- expenditures (17)
- facility (61)
- finance (338)
- financing (21)
- form (216)
- form 700 (21)
- fppc (219)
- funds (34)
- gis (37)
- housing (28)
- iec (36)
- independent (19)
- individual (23)
- individual expenditure ceilings (15)
- late (21)
- loans (7)
- lobbyist (19)
- map (7)
- mayor (6)
- monetary (61)
- non-filer (7)
- non-monetary (10)
- november (61)
- open book (10)
- openbook (10)
- parking (9)
- paving (8)
- payments (23)
- permits (27)
- pipeline (24)
- planning (79)
- promised (10)
- public (58)
- public buildings (54)
- public financing (38)
- received (9)
- ref:basemap (11)
- residential (20)
- san francisco (8)
- schedules (8)
- sei (21)
- sfmta (6)
- sfo (19)
- sfopenbook (10)
- shapefile (40)
- spending (7)
- statement of economic interests (20)
- street (14)
- summary (122)
- survey (16)
- third-party (64)
- transportation
- trees (7)
- vec (18)
- voluntary (8)
- voluntary expenditure ceiling (25)
- zoning (29)